Hello
Long time ago i did it something like this:
I used plans from McFP archive
It working very well on first plugin. Tested with two differents PS/2 keyboards.
Are You sure your circuits PCB is correct? Or use correct batch for ATtiny?
Search found 96 matches
- 17 Jan 2025, 13:36
- Forum: Support
- Topic: Pluggy McPF adapter not working
- Replies: 1
- Views: 582
- 23 Dec 2024, 17:25
- Forum: Hardware and software hacking
- Topic: Zoom rotator [test]
- Replies: 18
- Views: 11317
Re: Zoom rotator [test]
Yes, You're right. I did it.
Now is very faaast
Backward copy is now only few times exetuting.
Source:
http://www.changeit.ppa.pl/ftp/r_7x0.asm
- 21 Dec 2024, 16:53
- Forum: Hardware and software hacking
- Topic: Zoom rotator [test]
- Replies: 18
- Views: 11317
Re: Zoom rotator [test]
There should be an opcode NCOPY in ROMvX0 that is slower than SYS_CopyMemory but might have smaller setup times. I wrote it. Alas I do not remember its peak performance. Looking at the code it seems to achieve 8 pixels per scanline, two thirds of the peak speed of SYS_CopyMemory. But when the chunk...
- 20 Dec 2024, 20:49
- Forum: Hardware and software hacking
- Topic: Zoom rotator [test]
- Replies: 18
- Views: 11317
Re: Zoom rotator [test]
Hello
I apologize, i lied last time.
I have studied the ROMvX0's documentation and i did somethig faster.
I used two sys function: SYS_CopyMemory for forward copy areas and SYS_MemCopyByte for backward.
Now wroking good on the ScreenMode 2 too.
I apologize, i lied last time.
I have studied the ROMvX0's documentation and i did somethig faster.
I used two sys function: SYS_CopyMemory for forward copy areas and SYS_MemCopyByte for backward.
Now wroking good on the ScreenMode 2 too.
- 15 Dec 2024, 14:31
- Forum: Hardware and software hacking
- Topic: Zoom rotator [test]
- Replies: 18
- Views: 11317
Re: Zoom rotator [test]
Hello
This is my last word in this mather.
Now is much faster than latest version. I used one SYS function to copy areas.
This is my last word in this mather.
Now is much faster than latest version. I used one SYS function to copy areas.
- 07 Dec 2024, 22:30
- Forum: Hardware and software hacking
- Topic: Zoom rotator [test]
- Replies: 18
- Views: 11317
Re: Zoom rotator [test]
Hello
Your effect is very spectatular
I tested previous version for dev7 on real hardware but not working. Propably i have too old version of this rom.
I hat to use emulator.
Where can i find latest version of dev7 rom?
Second version woking very well on ROMv6.
Your effect is very spectatular
I tested previous version for dev7 on real hardware but not working. Propably i have too old version of this rom.
I hat to use emulator.
Where can i find latest version of dev7 rom?
Second version woking very well on ROMv6.
- 28 Nov 2024, 19:46
- Forum: Hardware and software hacking
- Topic: Zoom rotator [test]
- Replies: 18
- Views: 11317
Re: Zoom rotator [test]
Hello
I rewrote all code to vX0 asembler. Now is much faster but without rave
Source: http://changeit.ppa.pl/ftp/rotator_vx0.asm
I rewrote all code to vX0 asembler. Now is much faster but without rave
Source: http://changeit.ppa.pl/ftp/rotator_vx0.asm
- 24 Nov 2024, 17:10
- Forum: Hardware and software hacking
- Topic: New vCPU instructions 2.0
- Replies: 100
- Views: 94605
Re: New vCPU instructions 2.0
Question: possible is generate a txt file with instruction and parameters, and how is coded? Please.
exp: ADDXX <WORD var1>, <BYTE var2> , imm8
On this moment i have problems guess how is now. I checked some instructions and Is little chaos.
exp: ADDXX <WORD var1>, <BYTE var2> , imm8
On this moment i have problems guess how is now. I checked some instructions and Is little chaos.
- 24 Nov 2024, 12:57
- Forum: Hardware and software hacking
- Topic: New vCPU instructions 2.0
- Replies: 100
- Views: 94605
- 23 Nov 2024, 13:47
- Forum: Hardware and software hacking
- Topic: New vCPU instructions 2.0
- Replies: 100
- Views: 94605
Re: New vCPU instructions 2.0
I did few tests on randomly instructions. Some working correctly. But some not.
Exp. DEEK+ (opcode 0x60) working like DOKE+. Propably is wrong definied in instructions.txt file on Github.
Exp. DEEK+ (opcode 0x60) working like DOKE+. Propably is wrong definied in instructions.txt file on Github.